Thursday, September 13, 2007

Ingersoll on Genocide

The following is a quote from Robert G. Ingersoll (1833-1899) to finish up my 3 day vent on the genocides of the Bible.

If the Bible be true, God commanded his chosen people to destroy men simply for the crime of defending their native land. They were not allowed to spare trembling and white-haired age, nor dimpled babes clasped in the mothers' arms. They were ordered to kill women, and to pierce, with the sword of war, the unborn child. "Our heavenly Father" commanded the Hebrews to kill the men and women, the fathers, sons and brothers, but to preserve the girls alive. Why were not the maidens also killed? Why were they spared? Read the thirty-first chapter of Numbers, and you will find that the maidens were given to the soldiers and the priests. Is there, in all the history of war, a more infamous thing than this? Is it possible that God permitted the violets of modesty, that grow and shed their perfume in the maiden's heart, to be trampled beneath the brutal feet of lust? If this was the order of God, what, under the same circumstances, would have been the command of a devil? When, in this age of the world, a woman, a wife, a mother, reads this record, she should, with scorn and loathing, throw the book away. A general, who now should make such an order, giving over to massacre and rapine a conquered people, would be held in execration by the whole civilized world. Yet, if the bible be true, the supreme and infinite God was once a savage.

A little while ago, out upon the western plains, in a little path leading to a cabin, were found the bodies of two children and their mother. Her breast was filled with wounds received in the defense of her darlings. They had been murdered by the savages. Suppose when looking at their lifeless forms, some one had said, "This was done by the command of God!" In Canaan there were countless scenes like this. There was no pity in inspired war. God raised the black flag, and commanded his soldiers to kill even the smiling infant in its mother's arms. Who is the blasphemer; the man who denies the existence of God, or he who covers the robes of the Infinite with innocent blood?

We are told in the Pentateuch, that God, the father of us all, gave thousands of maidens, after having killed their fathers, their mothers, and their brothers, to satisfy the brutal lusts of savage men. If there be a God, I pray him to write in his book, opposite my name, that I denied this lie for him.

5 Comments:

Blogger Becky said...

Yeah... I have trouble with this stuff too. I admit it. Lot's of trouble.

And a new title I see... A little LOL and a little disturbed over here with the image, but I suppose that's the idea.

(It took me two tries to manage the word verification. Why do they make these things so hard AND how can someone who can't manage word verification be expected to puzzle out a tolerably intelligent answer to your posts?)

8:36 PM  
Blogger R.K. said...

I don't know...you are the language God! I'm pretty sure that if I'd taken that test I'd be lucky to have scored in the same range as hapless Glennard over there! I'm still laughing over his comments.

But yeah, I really don't think there's any logical answer to the genocides of the bible.

1:36 PM  
Blogger R.K. said...

Man, it's amazing how much tone of voice adds to the meaning of a statement. I think that first sentence could be taken about 10 ways!

12:21 AM  
Blogger Becky said...

LOL. I believe I said I was a language god. Not God. Keep it straight Random!

Also... This is a shoddy way to ask you but I suck at calling people and Glen is worse than I am. Are you going to be around over Thanksgiving? I was hoping we could see you this time around... My email is ykcebmailatyahoodotca. Drop me a line okay?

9:28 PM  
Blogger Becky said...

Never mind. I'm sick. We might not even be coming now. Frickin.

9:47 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home